TraceleafAdmin
Notifier of record

Scandinavian Tobacco Group Eersel B.V: the brands it has notified

Named in a government registerCompany registry record76 linked brands
On the public record, not assessed

Scandinavian Tobacco Group Eersel B.V is in this dataset because a government authority published a record naming it against 76 notified brands. Everything on this page is read out of that record. Nothing has been assessed: no state licence, PACT Act registration, shipment record or port of entry has been checked for this company, so the fields listed as uncollected below are gaps in collection, not findings.

Record fetched 11 October 2026. No assessment date, because no assessment has been run.
01

What the register states

Each row is a value published by the authority named at the foot of this page. Nothing here is derived.

Company name as notified
Scandinavian Tobacco Group Eersel B.V
Role as notified
MANUFACTURER
02

Brands notified by this company

Each row is a brand this company filed a notification for, or was named against. Where the register publishes one field for both the manufacturer and the importer, the role is unresolved and the link says so.

  • 2de KeusConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • 2de KeusConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • ABConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • AgioConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Alec BradleyConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • AmphoraConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • AmsterdamerConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • BalmoralConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • BalmoralConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • BalmoralConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • BalmoralConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • BalmoralConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Cadena SelectionConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • CAOConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • CAOConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • CAOConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • ClanConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • ClassicoConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Clement DidotConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Clement DidotConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • ClubConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • DavidoffConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • DieselConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Don PabloConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Don TomasConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Don TomasConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Don TomasConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • El CreditoConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • EnsorConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • EnsorConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • GoldConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • GrangerConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Hair of the DogConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • J-P CouvertConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Joseph MartinConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Joseph MartinConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • KentuckyConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • La EstrellaConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • La GlanerieConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • La PazConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • La PazConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • La SelectaConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • La SelectaConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • LafayetteConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • M By MacanudoConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • MacanudoConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • MacanudoConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Maison du CigareConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Maison ThiefryConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • ManilConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • ManilConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Mehari'sConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • MeharisConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • MercatorConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Oud MechelenConfirmed
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.

Showing the first 60 of 76. 76 of the 76 are stated outright by an authority rather than inferred from a field that carries two roles at once.

03

Not collected yet

Each row is a check Traceleaf has not run for this company. Uncollected is not the same as zero, and not the same as nothing found.

City and state
placeholder — not collected
Shipments per month
placeholder — not collected
Units per month
placeholder — not collected
Ports of entry
placeholder — not collected
State cannabis licences
placeholder — not collected
PACT Act registration
placeholder — not collected
04

Records

The authority that published the record, and the instrument that obliges it to. The register's own title, its endpoint and the field each value was read out of are operational detail and are not published.

  • FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium)
    Published under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8). Fetched .

A notification is a statement the notifying company made to that authority on that date, published because the instrument above requires it. It is evidence of what was declared, not a finding by Traceleaf and not an endorsement by the authority.

This is a demonstration build. There is no billing, no checkout and no account, and the locked sections above are rendered from the same dataset as the free ones and are obscured to show where the line would fall.

Looking for a importer we don’t cover?

Name it and we will trace it next. Every miss is demand data: the importers people search for and we cannot answer are what decides the order we build coverage in.

Not wired up in this demo. The fields are disabled and nothing is sent or stored.