TraceleafAdmin
Notifier of record

Qcig: the brands it has notified

Named in a government registerCompany registry recordUnited Kingdom112 linked brands
On the public record, not assessed

Qcig is in this dataset because a government authority published a record naming it against 112 notified brands. Everything on this page is read out of that record. Nothing has been assessed: no state licence, PACT Act registration, shipment record or port of entry has been checked for this company, so the fields listed as uncollected below are gaps in collection, not findings.

Record fetched 11 October 2026. No assessment date, because no assessment has been run.
01

What the register states

Each row is a value published by the authority named at the foot of this page. Nothing here is derived.

Company name as notified
Qcig
Address as notified
53-59 New Tythe Street, Nottingham, NG10 2DL
Country as notified
GB
Role
Not resolved — this authority publishes one field covering both the manufacturer and the importer, so it does not say which of the two this company is
02

Brands notified by this company

Each row is a brand this company filed a notification for, or was named against. Where the register publishes one field for both the manufacturer and the importer, the role is unresolved and the link says so.

  • B.VAPInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • BadInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Bad MonkeyInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Bald ThugInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • BarrracudaInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Bordeaux VapoteInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Candy VapeInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • CEI VapeInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Celtic VapoursInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Cloud headInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Cloud NineInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • CloudbasInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • CloudbaseInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • DInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Daisy DukesInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • DarthInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Darth VInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Darth VapourInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Devil triggerInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • DoInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • DonInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Don VInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Don VaperInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • DouInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Double DInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Double DDInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Dulwich VapeInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • eInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • E-NicInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • EciInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Ecig2uInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • EcigaretInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Ecigarette31Inferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Eciggy UKInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • EcigsInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • EcigswagInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • EjuiceologyInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • ELFCInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • EnInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • EnvyInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • EverydaInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • EverydayInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Everyday E-liqInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • FBVInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Foggy VapesInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Gorilla VapesInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • ivapotecleanInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • King VapeInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Love VapeInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • OVInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Oval MistInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • PencigInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Pure VInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Pure VapourInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • QcigInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • QcigInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.

Showing the first 60 of 112. 0 of the 112 are stated outright by an authority rather than inferred from a field that carries two roles at once.

03

Not collected yet

Each row is a check Traceleaf has not run for this company. Uncollected is not the same as zero, and not the same as nothing found.

City and state
placeholder — not collected
Shipments per month
placeholder — not collected
Units per month
placeholder — not collected
Ports of entry
placeholder — not collected
State cannabis licences
placeholder — not collected
PACT Act registration
placeholder — not collected
04

Records

The authority that published the record, and the instrument that obliges it to. The register's own title, its endpoint and the field each value was read out of are operational detail and are not published.

  • Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany
    Published under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21. Fetched .

A notification is a statement the notifying company made to that authority on that date, published because the instrument above requires it. It is evidence of what was declared, not a finding by Traceleaf and not an endorsement by the authority.

This is a demonstration build. There is no billing, no checkout and no account, and the locked sections above are rendered from the same dataset as the free ones and are obscured to show where the line would fall.

Looking for a importer we don’t cover?

Name it and we will trace it next. Every miss is demand data: the importers people search for and we cannot answer are what decides the order we build coverage in.

Not wired up in this demo. The fields are disabled and nothing is sent or stored.