Eos Leisure Limited: the brands it has notified
Eos Leisure Limited is in this dataset because a government authority published a record naming it against 980 notified brands. Everything on this page is read out of that record. Nothing has been assessed: no state licence, PACT Act registration, shipment record or port of entry has been checked for this company, so the fields listed as uncollected below are gaps in collection, not findings.
What the register states
Each row is a value published by the authority named at the foot of this page. Nothing here is derived.
- Company name as notified
- Eos Leisure Limited
- Address as notified
- Unit 9 Childerditch Industrial Park, Brentwood, Essex, CM13 3HD
- Country as notified
- GB
- Role
- Not resolved — this authority publishes one field covering both the manufacturer and the importer, so it does not say which of the two this company is
Brands notified by this company
Each row is a brand this company filed a notification for, or was named against. Where the register publishes one field for both the manufacturer and the importer, the role is unresolved and the link says so.
- Dash Blackcurrant 20mgInferrednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Dash Custard 20mgInferrednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Dash Fruit Crush 20mgInferrednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Dash Menthol 20mgInferrednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Dash Strawberry 20mgInferrednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Dash Tobacco 20mgInferrednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Directors Cut Cog 3 80VG 3mgInferrednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Directors Cut Cog 3 80VG 6mgInferrednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Directors Cut Cog One 80VG 3mgInferrednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Directors Cut Cog One 80VG 6mgInferrednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Directors Cut Cog Two 80VG 3mgInferrednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Directors Cut Cog Two 80VG 6mgInferrednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - From the Pantry Apple Bake 12mgInferrednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - From the Pantry Apple Bake 18mgInferrednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - From the Pantry Apple Bake 3mgInferrednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - From the Pantry Apple Bake 6mgInferrednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - From the Pantry Lemon Tart 12mgInferrednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - From the Pantry Lemon Tart 18mgInferrednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - From the Pantry Lemon Tart 3mgInferrednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Showing the first 60 of 980. 0 of the 980 are stated outright by an authority rather than inferred from a field that carries two roles at once.
Not collected yet
Each row is a check Traceleaf has not run for this company. Uncollected is not the same as zero, and not the same as nothing found.
- City and state
- placeholder — not collected
- Shipments per month
- placeholder — not collected
- Units per month
- placeholder — not collected
- Ports of entry
- placeholder — not collected
- State cannabis licences
- placeholder — not collected
- PACT Act registration
- placeholder — not collected
Records
The authority that published the record, and the instrument that obliges it to. The register's own title, its endpoint and the field each value was read out of are operational detail and are not published.
- Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), GermanyPublished under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21. Fetched .
A notification is a statement the notifying company made to that authority on that date, published because the instrument above requires it. It is evidence of what was declared, not a finding by Traceleaf and not an endorsement by the authority.
This is a demonstration build. There is no billing, no checkout and no account, and the locked sections above are rendered from the same dataset as the free ones and are obscured to show where the line would fall.
Looking for a importer we don’t cover?
Name it and we will trace it next. Every miss is demand data: the importers people search for and we cannot answer are what decides the order we build coverage in.