TraceleafAdmin
Notifier of record

Cherish Vapor Ltd: the brands it has notified

Named in a government registerCompany registry recordUnited Kingdom20 linked brands
On the public record, not assessed

Cherish Vapor Ltd is in this dataset because a government authority published a record naming it against 20 notified brands. Everything on this page is read out of that record. Nothing has been assessed: no state licence, PACT Act registration, shipment record or port of entry has been checked for this company, so the fields listed as uncollected below are gaps in collection, not findings.

Record fetched 11 October 2026. No assessment date, because no assessment has been run.
01

What the register states

Each row is a value published by the authority named at the foot of this page. Nothing here is derived.

Company name as notified
Cherish Vapor Ltd
Address as notified
91 Redfern Road, Tyseley, Birmingham, B11 2BH
Country as notified
GB
Role
Not resolved — this authority publishes one field covering both the manufacturer and the importer, so it does not say which of the two this company is
02

Brands notified by this company

Each row is a brand this company filed a notification for, or was named against. Where the register publishes one field for both the manufacturer and the importer, the role is unresolved and the link says so.

  • notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Moreish BrewedInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Moreish puffInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Moreish puffInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Morish puffInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Morish puffInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • RamseyInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • Ramsey on IceInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
  • VapestaInferred
    notified 2026-10-11
    Why we think this
    The reasoning, in the words the record supports
    Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
    Records behind it
    No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
03

Not collected yet

Each row is a check Traceleaf has not run for this company. Uncollected is not the same as zero, and not the same as nothing found.

City and state
placeholder — not collected
Shipments per month
placeholder — not collected
Units per month
placeholder — not collected
Ports of entry
placeholder — not collected
State cannabis licences
placeholder — not collected
PACT Act registration
placeholder — not collected
04

Records

The authority that published the record, and the instrument that obliges it to. The register's own title, its endpoint and the field each value was read out of are operational detail and are not published.

  • Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany
    Published under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21. Fetched .

A notification is a statement the notifying company made to that authority on that date, published because the instrument above requires it. It is evidence of what was declared, not a finding by Traceleaf and not an endorsement by the authority.

This is a demonstration build. There is no billing, no checkout and no account, and the locked sections above are rendered from the same dataset as the free ones and are obscured to show where the line would fall.

Looking for a importer we don’t cover?

Name it and we will trace it next. Every miss is demand data: the importers people search for and we cannot answer are what decides the order we build coverage in.

Not wired up in this demo. The fields are disabled and nothing is sent or stored.