Shenzhen Tablet Electronics Limited: which brands it is named as making
Shenzhen Tablet Electronics Limited is in this dataset because a government authority published a record naming it against 62 notified brands. Everything on this page is read out of that record. Nothing has been assessed: no production licence, export licence, capacity figure, patent or court record has been checked for this company, so the fields listed as uncollected below are gaps in collection, not findings.
What the register states
Each row is a value published by the authority named at the foot of this page. Nothing here is derived.
- Company name as notified
- Shenzhen Tablet Electronics Limited
- Address as notified
- 2F,B5A Building, Yingzhan Industrial Zone, Longtian Community, Kengzi Street,Longgang, Shenzhen,China
- Country as notified
- CN
- Country
- CN
These are inferences from the company name. They are kept separate from the rows above because attributing them to the authority would be putting words in its mouth.
Brands notified against this company
Each row is a notified brand whose filing names this company. The confidence level says whether the authority stated the manufacturing role or whether it published one field for two roles.
- ANUConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Aroma KingConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - AUPOConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - ésmocoConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - FUUMConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Gif barConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - HUSSARConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - JHRConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - KINVSConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - KUBIKConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - MY PAFFConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - OG Original GangsterConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - PRINCEConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - puffmiConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - RUNFREEConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - SaltConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - SALT CRISTALLITEConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - SALT CRISTALLITE PRO Apple 10 mg/mlConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - SALT CRISTALLITE PRO Apple 20 mg/mlConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - SALT CRISTALLITE PRO Berry 10 mg/mlConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - SALT CRISTALLITE PRO Berry 20 mg/mlConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - SALT CRISTALLITE PRO Cherry 10 mg/mlConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - SALT CRISTALLITE PRO Cherry 20 mg/mlConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - SALT CRISTALLITE PRO deviceConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - SALT CRISTALLITE PRO Fusion 10 mg/mlConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - SALT CRISTALLITE PRO Fusion 20 mg/mlConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - SALT CRISTALLITE PRO Grape 10 mg/mlConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - SALT CRISTALLITE PRO Grape 20 mg/mlConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - SALT CRISTALLITE PRO KITConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - SALT CRISTALLITE PRO Lemon 10 mg/mlConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - SALT CRISTALLITE PRO Lemon 20 mg/mlConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - SALT CRISTALLITE PRO Spark 10 mg/mlConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - SALT CRISTALLITE PRO Spark 20 mg/mlConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - SALT CRISTALLITE PRO Summer 10 mg/mlConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - SALT CRISTALLITE PRO Summer 20 mg/mlConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - SIUDEConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - SIUESConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - SUPER MARYConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - UGOConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - UPENDSConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Showing the first 60 of 62. 62 of the 62 are stated outright by an authority rather than inferred from a field that carries two roles at once.
Not collected yet
Each row is a check Traceleaf has not run for this company. Uncollected is not the same as zero, and not the same as nothing found.
- Chinese-language company name
- placeholder — not collected
- Unified social credit code
- placeholder — not collected
- City and province
- placeholder — not collected
- Year founded
- placeholder — not collected
- Registered capital
- placeholder — not collected
- STMA production licence
- placeholder — not collected
- Export licence
- placeholder — not collected
- Declared annual capacity
- placeholder — not collected
- Product lines and coil technology
- placeholder — not collected
- Patents
- placeholder — not collected
- Litigation
- placeholder — not collected
- Certifications
- placeholder — not collected
- Headcount
- placeholder — not collected
Records
The authority that published the record, and the instrument that obliges it to. The register's own title, its endpoint and the field each value was read out of are operational detail and are not published.
- FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium)Published under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8). Fetched .
- Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), GermanyPublished under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21. Fetched .
A notification is a statement the notifying company made to that authority on that date, published because the instrument above requires it. It is evidence of what was declared, not a finding by Traceleaf and not an endorsement by the authority.
This is a demonstration build. There is no billing, no checkout and no account, and the locked sections above are rendered from the same dataset as the free ones and are obscured to show where the line would fall.
Looking for a factory we don’t cover?
Name it and we will trace it next. Every miss is demand data: the factorys people search for and we cannot answer are what decides the order we build coverage in.