Manufacturer

Shenzhen ReyMont Technology Co., Ltd: which brands it is named as making

Named in a government registerCompany registry recordChina43 linked brands

On the public record, not assessed

Shenzhen ReyMont Technology Co., Ltd is in this dataset because a government authority published a record naming it against 43 notified brands. Everything on this page is read out of that record. Nothing has been assessed: no production licence, export licence, capacity figure, patent or court record has been checked for this company, so the fields listed as uncollected below are gaps in collection, not findings.

Record fetched 11 October 2026. No assessment date, because no assessment has been run.

What the register states

Each row is a value published by the authority named at the foot of this page. Nothing here is derived.

Company name as notified: Shenzhen ReyMont Technology Co., Ltd
Address as notified: 8A2 Building, ZhiGao Industrial Park, YangTian Road, XingDong, BaoAn District, Shenzhen, GuangDong, China, 518101
Country as notified: CN

Brands notified against this company

Each row is a notified brand whose filing names this company. The confidence level says whether the authority stated the manufacturing role or whether it published one field for two roles.

212°FInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
AMMO VAPERInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
aVaInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
AvaTinaInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
BalismokeInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Big BoldInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
DeviInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Devious VapesInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
DJ BarInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
DjbarInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
DjbarInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
E-FastInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
FUMEEInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
FUMÉEInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Geek GorillaInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
GORILLA KINGInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
H2Inferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
HAXInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
IlegalyInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
K#RWAInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
K#RWA COLLECTIONInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
KarizamInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
KarizmaInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Karizma VapeInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
KudosInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
kudusInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Melodic VapeInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
NINJAInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Puff StuffInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
PuffrollInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
REVOBARInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
ReymontInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
SeshInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
SideKick E-liquidInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
SideKick E-liquidInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Sidekick VapeInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
SmokeeInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Vape cocoInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
vappoInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
vappoInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
VayperInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Vayper barInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
WolfbarInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.

Not collected yet

Each row is a check Traceleaf has not run for this company. Uncollected is not the same as zero, and not the same as nothing found.

Chinese-language company name: placeholder — not collected
Unified social credit code: placeholder — not collected
City and province: placeholder — not collected
Year founded: placeholder — not collected
Registered capital: placeholder — not collected
STMA production licence: placeholder — not collected
Export licence: placeholder — not collected
Declared annual capacity: placeholder — not collected
Product lines and coil technology: placeholder — not collected
Patents: placeholder — not collected
Litigation: placeholder — not collected
Certifications: placeholder — not collected
Headcount: placeholder — not collected

Records

The authority that published the record, and the instrument that obliges it to. The register's own title, its endpoint and the field each value was read out of are operational detail and are not published.

Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany
Published under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21. Fetched 11 October 2026.

A notification is a statement the notifying company made to that authority on that date, published because the instrument above requires it. It is evidence of what was declared, not a finding by Traceleaf and not an endorsement by the authority.

This is a demonstration build. There is no billing, no checkout and no account, and the locked sections above are rendered from the same dataset as the free ones and are obscured to show where the line would fall.

Looking for a factory we don’t cover?

Name it and we will trace it next. Every miss is demand data: the factorys people search for and we cannot answer are what decides the order we build coverage in.