SHENZHEN ITSUWA TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD: which brands it is named as making
SHENZHEN ITSUWA TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD is in this dataset because a government authority published a record naming it against 85 notified brands. Everything on this page is read out of that record. Nothing has been assessed: no production licence, export licence, capacity figure, patent or court record has been checked for this company, so the fields listed as uncollected below are gaps in collection, not findings.
What the register states
Each row is a value published by the authority named at the foot of this page. Nothing here is derived.
- Company name as notified
- SHENZHEN ITSUWA TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD
- Other spellings in this register
- SHEN ZHEN Itsuwa Technology CO., LTD · SHENZHEN ITSUWA TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD · SHENZHEN Itsuwa Technology CO., LTD · Shen Zhen Itsuwa Technology CO., LTD · ShenZhen Itsuwa CO., LTD · Shenzhen ITSUWA Technology CO., LTD · Shenzhen Itsuwa Technology CO., LTD · Shenzhen Itsuwa Technology CO.,LTD · Shenzhen itsuwa Technology CO., LTD · Shenzhen itsuwa technology CO., LTD
- Address as notified
- 401, Building 6, Phase III, Yangbei Industrial Zone, Hangtian Community,Hangcheng Street, Bao'an District, Shenzhen, China
- Country as notified
- CN
- Country
- CN
These are inferences from the company name. They are kept separate from the rows above because attributing them to the authority would be putting words in its mouth.
Brands notified against this company
Each row is a notified brand whose filing names this company. The confidence level says whether the authority stated the manufacturing role or whether it published one field for two roles.
- AllovConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - AllovConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - AmigoConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - AmigoConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - AQUA VAPEConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Aroma TitanConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - AVA'AVAConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - BADGEConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - BE ONConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - BelidimConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - BITConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - BoltConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - BoRo MiamiConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - BosspuffConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - CIBACOConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - CYREXXConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - DARKConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Dinner Lady 5KConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - DunkeConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - ELDAConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - FrunkConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Frunk BarConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Frunk PodsConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - HK PUFFConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - HOLSTERConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - ICE VAPEConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - ICE VAPEConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - iPUFFERConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - ItsuwaConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Izy VapeConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - IzyvapeConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Izzy GoConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - KNUQOConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - KUIXConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - KUIX PUFFConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - KUIXPUFFConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Loop2Confirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - MAXConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - MONVAPConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - N oneConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - N oneConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - N oneConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - N oneConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - NEVIOSOConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - NEXTVAPORConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - NICEConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - NICEConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - NO RULZZConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - NO RULZZConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - NoovaConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - NS OriginalConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - OnepieceConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Oops!Confirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Pod FuelConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Pod FuelConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - POOHConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - PUFF DADDYConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Rev podConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - Rev podConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet. - ROCKEYConfirmednotified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supportsStated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.Records behind itNo source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Showing the first 60 of 85. 85 of the 85 are stated outright by an authority rather than inferred from a field that carries two roles at once.
Not collected yet
Each row is a check Traceleaf has not run for this company. Uncollected is not the same as zero, and not the same as nothing found.
- Chinese-language company name
- placeholder — not collected
- Unified social credit code
- placeholder — not collected
- City and province
- placeholder — not collected
- Year founded
- placeholder — not collected
- Registered capital
- placeholder — not collected
- STMA production licence
- placeholder — not collected
- Export licence
- placeholder — not collected
- Declared annual capacity
- placeholder — not collected
- Product lines and coil technology
- placeholder — not collected
- Patents
- placeholder — not collected
- Litigation
- placeholder — not collected
- Certifications
- placeholder — not collected
- Headcount
- placeholder — not collected
Records
The authority that published the record, and the instrument that obliges it to. The register's own title, its endpoint and the field each value was read out of are operational detail and are not published.
- FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium)Published under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8). Fetched .
- Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), GermanyPublished under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21. Fetched .
A notification is a statement the notifying company made to that authority on that date, published because the instrument above requires it. It is evidence of what was declared, not a finding by Traceleaf and not an endorsement by the authority.
This is a demonstration build. There is no billing, no checkout and no account, and the locked sections above are rendered from the same dataset as the free ones and are obscured to show where the line would fall.
Looking for a factory we don’t cover?
Name it and we will trace it next. Every miss is demand data: the factorys people search for and we cannot answer are what decides the order we build coverage in.