Brand

Who makes Liquid Blackcurrant 20mg? What the public record shows

Not yet assessedNamed in a government register

Liquid Blackcurrant 20mg is named in a government register. Nothing about licensing has been checked.

A government register names this brand. Under the EU tobacco-products regime the company placing an e-cigarette on the market must notify it to a national authority, and those notifications are published — so the brand name, and usually the manufacturer of the hardware behind it, are on the public record with a date. That is what this page shows, and all it shows. Nothing about licensing has been assessed: no state licence list, recall notice, trademark filing, customs record or dispensary menu has been searched for this name, so every field below marked placeholder is uncollected rather than empty, and the absence of a finding is not a finding.

Record fetched 11 October 2026. No assessment date, because no assessment has been run.

Who the register says makes the hardware

Each row is a company a government authority named in the notification filed for this brand. The confidence level says whether the authority stated the manufacturing role, or published one field covering both the manufacturer and the importer.

The notification held for Liquid Blackcurrant 20mg names no manufacturer. Several national registers publish the notifying company and nothing upstream of it, so this is a gap in what was published, not a finding about the brand.

Who filed the notification

The company that placed the product on the European market, as named by the authority. It is not a US importer and no US customs record has been checked.

NextGEN360Inferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.

What else the register states

Values published against this brand, verbatim. Nothing derived.

Brand name as notified: Liquid Blackcurrant 20mg
Record read from: regulatory filing published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany

Licensed anywhere?

Not yet checked against state licence lists.

A European product notification says who makes a device and who put it on the market there. It says nothing about whether anyone is licensed to sell cannabis under this name in any US state. No state licence list has been searched for Liquid Blackcurrant 20mg, so there is no finding here in either direction — and the manufacturer link above is not one.

Not collected yet

State licence status: placeholder — not collected
Owner entity in a business registry: placeholder — not collected
US trademark (USPTO): placeholder — not collected
US importer of record: placeholder — not collected
Shelf sightings: placeholder — not collected
Prices: placeholder — not collected
Red flags: placeholder — not collected
Lab certificates (COA): placeholder — not collected

Uncollected is not zero and not “nothing found”. The manufacturer rows above are collected because an authority published them; every row here is a check that has not been run.

Records

The authority that published the record and the instrument that obliges it to. The register's own title, its endpoint and the field each value was read out of are operational detail and are not published.

Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany
Published under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21. Fetched 11 October 2026.

One authority stands behind this page. A notification is a statement the notifying company made on that date, published because the instrument above requires it. It is not a finding by Traceleaf and not an endorsement by the authority.

This is a demonstration build. There is no billing, no checkout and no account, and the locked sections above are rendered from the same dataset as the free ones and are obscured to show where the line would fall.

Looking for a brand we don’t cover?

Name it and we will trace it next. Every miss is demand data: the brands people search for and we cannot answer are what decides the order we build coverage in.